Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:03
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Threads is testing spoiler text, Zuckerberg says - TechCrunch
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s next?
Chinese Biotech Showcases Challenger to Eli Lilly’s Obesity Drug - Bloomberg.com
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Thank you.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Which brand is the best home slippers in the Middle East?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Dave Chappelle and Mo Amer on Politics and Comedy, SNL Monologues - Variety
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Concerns About the US Economy Continue to Grow While Its Forecasts Shrink - splinter.com
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Older Americans are happiest living in these 5 US states, study says — is yours one of them? - Yahoo